From 8557cd74ca8af9a71ae19d445e33d92bd50a6dc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Veaceslav Falico Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 21:39:59 +0200 Subject: bonding: replace SLAVE_IS_OK() with bond_slave_can_tx() They're verifying the same thing (except of IFF_UP, which is implied for netif_running(), which is also a prerequisite). CC: Jay Vosburgh CC: Andy Gospodarek Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c') diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c index 5a1e7b779cb..71232053210 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c @@ -3850,14 +3850,14 @@ static int bond_ethtool_get_settings(struct net_device *bond_dev, ecmd->duplex = DUPLEX_UNKNOWN; ecmd->port = PORT_OTHER; - /* Since SLAVE_IS_OK returns false for all inactive or down slaves, we + /* Since bond_slave_can_tx returns false for all inactive or down slaves, we * do not need to check mode. Though link speed might not represent * the true receive or transmit bandwidth (not all modes are symmetric) * this is an accurate maximum. */ read_lock(&bond->lock); bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) { - if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) { + if (bond_slave_can_tx(slave)) { if (slave->speed != SPEED_UNKNOWN) speed += slave->speed; if (ecmd->duplex == DUPLEX_UNKNOWN && -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2