From 85a19e07e30f67c517266cafe92b7bcd9b98966d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Prasanna S. Panchamukhi" Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:24:31 -0700 Subject: wimax/i2400m: fix system freeze caused by an infinite loop [v1] This patch fixes an infinite loop caused by i2400m_tx_fifo_push() due to a corner case where there is no tail space in the TX FIFO. Please refer the documentation in the code for details. Signed-off-by: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi --- drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/tx.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/tx.c') diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/tx.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/tx.c index 101550a2f5a..609f1ca6e9f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/tx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/tx.c @@ -341,6 +341,14 @@ size_t __i2400m_tx_tail_room(struct i2400m *i2400m) * @padding: ensure that there is at least this many bytes of free * contiguous space in the fifo. This is needed because later on * we might need to add padding. + * @try_head: specify either to allocate head room or tail room space + * in the TX FIFO. This boolean is required to avoids a system hang + * due to an infinite loop caused by i2400m_tx_fifo_push(). + * The caller must always try to allocate tail room space first by + * calling this routine with try_head = 0. In case if there + * is not enough tail room space but there is enough head room space, + * (i2400m_tx_fifo_push() returns TAIL_FULL) try to allocate head + * room space, by calling this routine again with try_head = 1. * * Returns: * @@ -372,6 +380,48 @@ size_t __i2400m_tx_tail_room(struct i2400m *i2400m) * fail and return TAIL_FULL and let the caller figure out if we wants to * skip the tail room and try to allocate from the head. * + * There is a corner case, wherein i2400m_tx_new() can get into + * an infinite loop calling i2400m_tx_fifo_push(). + * In certain situations, tx_in would have reached on the top of TX FIFO + * and i2400m_tx_tail_room() returns 0, as described below: + * + * N ___________ tail room is zero + * |<- IN ->| + * | | + * | | + * | | + * | data | + * |<- OUT ->| + * | | + * | | + * | head room | + * 0 ----------- + * During such a time, where tail room is zero in the TX FIFO and if there + * is a request to add a payload to TX FIFO, which calls: + * i2400m_tx() + * ->calls i2400m_tx_close() + * ->calls i2400m_tx_skip_tail() + * goto try_new; + * ->calls i2400m_tx_new() + * |----> [try_head:] + * infinite loop | ->calls i2400m_tx_fifo_push() + * | if (tail_room < needed) + * | if (head_room => needed) + * | return TAIL_FULL; + * |<---- goto try_head; + * + * i2400m_tx() calls i2400m_tx_close() to close the message, since there + * is no tail room to accommodate the payload and calls + * i2400m_tx_skip_tail() to skip the tail space. Now i2400m_tx() calls + * i2400m_tx_new() to allocate space for new message header calling + * i2400m_tx_fifo_push() that returns TAIL_FULL, since there is no tail space + * to accommodate the message header, but there is enough head space. + * The i2400m_tx_new() keeps re-retrying by calling i2400m_tx_fifo_push() + * ending up in a loop causing system freeze. + * + * This corner case is avoided by using a try_head boolean, + * as an argument to i2400m_tx_fifo_push(). + * * Note: * * Assumes i2400m->tx_lock is taken, and we use that as a barrier @@ -380,7 +430,8 @@ size_t __i2400m_tx_tail_room(struct i2400m *i2400m) * pop data off the queue */ static -void *i2400m_tx_fifo_push(struct i2400m *i2400m, size_t size, size_t padding) +void *i2400m_tx_fifo_push(struct i2400m *i2400m, size_t size, + size_t padding, bool try_head) { struct device *dev = i2400m_dev(i2400m); size_t room, tail_room, needed_size; @@ -395,7 +446,7 @@ void *i2400m_tx_fifo_push(struct i2400m *i2400m, size_t size, size_t padding) } /* Is there space at the tail? */ tail_room = __i2400m_tx_tail_room(i2400m); - if (tail_room < needed_size) { + if (!try_head && tail_room < needed_size) { /* * If the tail room space is not enough to push the message * in the TX FIFO, then there are two possibilities: @@ -510,14 +561,16 @@ void i2400m_tx_new(struct i2400m *i2400m) { struct device *dev = i2400m_dev(i2400m); struct i2400m_msg_hdr *tx_msg; + bool try_head = 0; BUG_ON(i2400m->tx_msg != NULL); try_head: - tx_msg = i2400m_tx_fifo_push(i2400m, I2400M_TX_PLD_SIZE, 0); + tx_msg = i2400m_tx_fifo_push(i2400m, I2400M_TX_PLD_SIZE, 0, try_head); if (tx_msg == NULL) goto out; else if (tx_msg == TAIL_FULL) { i2400m_tx_skip_tail(i2400m); d_printf(2, dev, "new TX message: tail full, trying head\n"); + try_head = 1; goto try_head; } memset(tx_msg, 0, I2400M_TX_PLD_SIZE); @@ -591,7 +644,7 @@ void i2400m_tx_close(struct i2400m *i2400m) aligned_size = ALIGN(tx_msg_moved->size, i2400m->bus_tx_block_size); padding = aligned_size - tx_msg_moved->size; if (padding > 0) { - pad_buf = i2400m_tx_fifo_push(i2400m, padding, 0); + pad_buf = i2400m_tx_fifo_push(i2400m, padding, 0, 0); if (unlikely(WARN_ON(pad_buf == NULL || pad_buf == TAIL_FULL))) { /* This should not happen -- append should verify @@ -657,6 +710,7 @@ int i2400m_tx(struct i2400m *i2400m, const void *buf, size_t buf_len, unsigned long flags; size_t padded_len; void *ptr; + bool try_head = 0; unsigned is_singleton = pl_type == I2400M_PT_RESET_WARM || pl_type == I2400M_PT_RESET_COLD; @@ -702,11 +756,12 @@ try_new: /* So we have a current message header; now append space for * the message -- if there is not enough, try the head */ ptr = i2400m_tx_fifo_push(i2400m, padded_len, - i2400m->bus_tx_block_size); + i2400m->bus_tx_block_size, try_head); if (ptr == TAIL_FULL) { /* Tail is full, try head */ d_printf(2, dev, "pl append: tail full\n"); i2400m_tx_close(i2400m); i2400m_tx_skip_tail(i2400m); + try_head = 1; goto try_new; } else if (ptr == NULL) { /* All full */ result = -ENOSPC; -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2