From e2d4096365e06b9a3799afbadc28b4519c0b3526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dominik Brodowski Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:09:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: use bitfield instead of p_state and state Instead of the two status values struct pcmcia_device->p_state and state, use descriptive bitfields. Most value-checking in drivers was invalid, as the core now only calls the ->remove() (a.k.a. detach) function in case the attachement _and_ configuration was successful. Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski --- drivers/telephony/ixj_pcmcia.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/telephony/ixj_pcmcia.c') diff --git a/drivers/telephony/ixj_pcmcia.c b/drivers/telephony/ixj_pcmcia.c index 5c7611c2ac6..dda0ca45d90 100644 --- a/drivers/telephony/ixj_pcmcia.c +++ b/drivers/telephony/ixj_pcmcia.c @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ static int ixj_probe(struct pcmcia_device *p_dev) } memset(p_dev->priv, 0, sizeof(struct ixj_info_t)); - p_dev->state |= DEV_PRESENT | DEV_CONFIG_PENDING; return ixj_config(p_dev); } @@ -60,8 +59,7 @@ static void ixj_detach(struct pcmcia_device *link) { DEBUG(0, "ixj_detach(0x%p)\n", link); - if (link->state & DEV_CONFIG) - ixj_cs_release(link); + ixj_cs_release(link); kfree(link->priv); } @@ -155,7 +153,6 @@ static int ixj_config(struct pcmcia_device * link) CS_CHECK(ParseTuple, pcmcia_parse_tuple(link, &tuple, &parse)); link->conf.ConfigBase = parse.config.base; link->conf.Present = parse.config.rmask[0]; - link->state |= DEV_CONFIG; tuple.DesiredTuple = CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY; tuple.Attributes = 0; CS_CHECK(GetFirstTuple, pcmcia_get_first_tuple(link, &tuple)); @@ -194,7 +191,6 @@ static int ixj_config(struct pcmcia_device * link) info->node.major = PHONE_MAJOR; link->dev_node = &info->node; ixj_get_serial(link, j); - link->state &= ~DEV_CONFIG_PENDING; return 0; cs_failed: cs_error(link, last_fn, last_ret); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2