From f2bb8f5cfb3bce595b2de251ed7638047fc4e530 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 13:10:16 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: don't commit the transaction if we dont have enough pinned bytes I noticed when running an enospc test that we would get stuck committing the transaction in check_data_space even though we truly didn't have enough space. So check to see if bytes_pinned is bigger than num_bytes, if it's not don't commit the transaction. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 5b9b6b6df24..0d0a3fe77bb 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -3089,6 +3089,13 @@ alloc: } goto again; } + + /* + * If we have less pinned bytes than we want to allocate then + * don't bother committing the transaction, it won't help us. + */ + if (data_sinfo->bytes_pinned < bytes) + committed = 1; spin_unlock(&data_sinfo->lock); /* commit the current transaction and try again */ -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2 From 723bda2083d44edbd6be0f0b09f902120dc07442 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 16:11:38 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: fix the allocator loop logic I was testing with empty_cluster = 0 to try and reproduce a problem and kept hitting early enospc panics. This was because our loop logic was a little confused. So this is what I did 1) Make the loop variable the ultimate decider on wether we should loop again isntead of checking to see if we had an uncached bg, empty size or empty cluster. 2) Increment loop before checking to see what we are on to make the loop definitions make more sense. 3) If we are on the chunk alloc loop don't set empty_size/empty_cluster to 0 unless we didn't actually allocate a chunk. If we did allocate a chunk we should be able to easily setup a new cluster so clearing empty_size/empty_cluster makes us less efficient. This kept me from hitting panics while trying to reproduce the other problem. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 0d0a3fe77bb..b42efc2ded5 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -5218,9 +5218,7 @@ loop: * LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE, set empty_size and empty_cluster to 0 and try * again */ - if (!ins->objectid && loop < LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE && - (found_uncached_bg || empty_size || empty_cluster || - allowed_chunk_alloc)) { + if (!ins->objectid && loop < LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) { index = 0; if (loop == LOOP_FIND_IDEAL && found_uncached_bg) { found_uncached_bg = false; @@ -5260,32 +5258,36 @@ loop: goto search; } - if (loop < LOOP_CACHING_WAIT) { - loop++; - goto search; - } + loop++; if (loop == LOOP_ALLOC_CHUNK) { - empty_size = 0; - empty_cluster = 0; - } + if (allowed_chunk_alloc) { + ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, num_bytes + + 2 * 1024 * 1024, data, + CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED); + allowed_chunk_alloc = 0; + if (ret == 1) + done_chunk_alloc = 1; + } else if (!done_chunk_alloc && + space_info->force_alloc == + CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE) { + space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED; + } - if (allowed_chunk_alloc) { - ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, num_bytes + - 2 * 1024 * 1024, data, - CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED); - allowed_chunk_alloc = 0; - done_chunk_alloc = 1; - } else if (!done_chunk_alloc && - space_info->force_alloc == CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE) { - space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED; + /* + * We didn't allocate a chunk, go ahead and drop the + * empty size and loop again. + */ + if (!done_chunk_alloc) + loop = LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE; } - if (loop < LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) { - loop++; - goto search; + if (loop == LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) { + empty_size = 0; + empty_cluster = 0; } - ret = -ENOSPC; + + goto search; } else if (!ins->objectid) { ret = -ENOSPC; } else if (ins->objectid) { -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2