From 57a45ced94fe48a701361d64230fc16eefa189dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:30:38 -0500 Subject: Btrfs: change reserved_extents to an atomic_t We track delayed allocation per inodes via 2 counters, one is outstanding_extents and reserved_extents. Outstanding_extents is already an atomic_t, but reserved_extents is not and is protected by a spinlock. So convert this to an atomic_t and instead of using a spinlock, use atomic_cmpxchg when releasing delalloc bytes. This makes our inode 72 bytes smaller, and reduces locking overhead (albiet it was minimal to begin with). Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 9007bbd01db..d97b69afbbf 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -6632,9 +6632,8 @@ struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb) ei->index_cnt = (u64)-1; ei->last_unlink_trans = 0; - spin_lock_init(&ei->accounting_lock); atomic_set(&ei->outstanding_extents, 0); - ei->reserved_extents = 0; + atomic_set(&ei->reserved_extents, 0); ei->ordered_data_close = 0; ei->orphan_meta_reserved = 0; @@ -6670,7 +6669,7 @@ void btrfs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode) WARN_ON(!list_empty(&inode->i_dentry)); WARN_ON(inode->i_data.nrpages); WARN_ON(atomic_read(&BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents)); - WARN_ON(BTRFS_I(inode)->reserved_extents); + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&BTRFS_I(inode)->reserved_extents)); /* * This can happen where we create an inode, but somebody else also -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2