From 9ba4611a3a7902c6bad70c5c205de5161fcfc17b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Mason Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:26:26 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: Fix 32 bit compiles by using an unsigned long byte count in the ordered extent The ordered extents have to fit in memory, so an unsigned long is sufficient. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h index 36e63f1f79b..199cb0b4f1d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h @@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent { * calculates the total size you need to allocate for an ordered sum * structure spanning 'bytes' in the file */ -static inline int btrfs_ordered_sum_size(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytes) +static inline int btrfs_ordered_sum_size(struct btrfs_root *root, + unsigned long bytes) { unsigned long num_sectors = (bytes + root->sectorsize - 1) / root->sectorsize; -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2