From 99d8f83c98930100cd70437b0c81a935e7a14b0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Mason Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 10:51:48 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: fix split_leaf double split corner case split_leaf was not properly balancing leaves when it was forced to split a leaf twice. This commit adds an extra push left and right before forcing the double split in hopes of getting the slot where we want to insert at either the start or end of the leaf. If the extra pushes do work, then we are able to avoid splitting twice and we keep the tree properly balanced. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c index 0d1d966b0fe..c3df14ce2cc 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c @@ -2304,12 +2304,17 @@ noinline int btrfs_leaf_free_space(struct btrfs_root *root, return ret; } +/* + * min slot controls the lowest index we're willing to push to the + * right. We'll push up to and including min_slot, but no lower + */ static noinline int __push_leaf_right(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path, int data_size, int empty, struct extent_buffer *right, - int free_space, u32 left_nritems) + int free_space, u32 left_nritems, + u32 min_slot) { struct extent_buffer *left = path->nodes[0]; struct extent_buffer *upper = path->nodes[1]; @@ -2327,7 +2332,7 @@ static noinline int __push_leaf_right(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (empty) nr = 0; else - nr = 1; + nr = max_t(u32, 1, min_slot); if (path->slots[0] >= left_nritems) push_space += data_size; @@ -2469,10 +2474,14 @@ out_unlock: * * returns 1 if the push failed because the other node didn't have enough * room, 0 if everything worked out and < 0 if there were major errors. + * + * this will push starting from min_slot to the end of the leaf. It won't + * push any slot lower than min_slot */ static int push_leaf_right(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root - *root, struct btrfs_path *path, int data_size, - int empty) + *root, struct btrfs_path *path, + int min_data_size, int data_size, + int empty, u32 min_slot) { struct extent_buffer *left = path->nodes[0]; struct extent_buffer *right; @@ -2514,8 +2523,8 @@ static int push_leaf_right(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root if (left_nritems == 0) goto out_unlock; - return __push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, data_size, empty, - right, free_space, left_nritems); + return __push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, min_data_size, empty, + right, free_space, left_nritems, min_slot); out_unlock: btrfs_tree_unlock(right); free_extent_buffer(right); @@ -2525,12 +2534,17 @@ out_unlock: /* * push some data in the path leaf to the left, trying to free up at * least data_size bytes. returns zero if the push worked, nonzero otherwise + * + * max_slot can put a limit on how far into the leaf we'll push items. The + * item at 'max_slot' won't be touched. Use (u32)-1 to make us do all the + * items */ static noinline int __push_leaf_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path, int data_size, int empty, struct extent_buffer *left, - int free_space, int right_nritems) + int free_space, u32 right_nritems, + u32 max_slot) { struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key; struct extent_buffer *right = path->nodes[0]; @@ -2549,9 +2563,9 @@ static noinline int __push_leaf_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, slot = path->slots[1]; if (empty) - nr = right_nritems; + nr = min(right_nritems, max_slot); else - nr = right_nritems - 1; + nr = min(right_nritems - 1, max_slot); for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { item = btrfs_item_nr(right, i); @@ -2712,10 +2726,14 @@ out: /* * push some data in the path leaf to the left, trying to free up at * least data_size bytes. returns zero if the push worked, nonzero otherwise + * + * max_slot can put a limit on how far into the leaf we'll push items. The + * item at 'max_slot' won't be touched. Use (u32)-1 to make us push all the + * items */ static int push_leaf_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root - *root, struct btrfs_path *path, int data_size, - int empty) + *root, struct btrfs_path *path, int min_data_size, + int data_size, int empty, u32 max_slot) { struct extent_buffer *right = path->nodes[0]; struct extent_buffer *left; @@ -2761,8 +2779,9 @@ static int push_leaf_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root goto out; } - return __push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, data_size, - empty, left, free_space, right_nritems); + return __push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, min_data_size, + empty, left, free_space, right_nritems, + max_slot); out: btrfs_tree_unlock(left); free_extent_buffer(left); @@ -2854,6 +2873,64 @@ static noinline int copy_for_split(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, return ret; } +/* + * double splits happen when we need to insert a big item in the middle + * of a leaf. A double split can leave us with 3 mostly empty leaves: + * leaf: [ slots 0 - N] [ our target ] [ N + 1 - total in leaf ] + * A B C + * + * We avoid this by trying to push the items on either side of our target + * into the adjacent leaves. If all goes well we can avoid the double split + * completely. + */ +static noinline int push_for_double_split(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, + struct btrfs_root *root, + struct btrfs_path *path, + int data_size) +{ + int ret; + int progress = 0; + int slot; + u32 nritems; + + slot = path->slots[0]; + + /* + * try to push all the items after our slot into the + * right leaf + */ + ret = push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, 1, data_size, 0, slot); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + if (ret == 0) + progress++; + + nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[0]); + /* + * our goal is to get our slot at the start or end of a leaf. If + * we've done so we're done + */ + if (path->slots[0] == 0 || path->slots[0] == nritems) + return 0; + + if (btrfs_leaf_free_space(root, path->nodes[0]) >= data_size) + return 0; + + /* try to push all the items before our slot into the next leaf */ + slot = path->slots[0]; + ret = push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, 1, data_size, 0, slot); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + if (ret == 0) + progress++; + + if (progress) + return 0; + return 1; +} + /* * split the path's leaf in two, making sure there is at least data_size * available for the resulting leaf level of the path. @@ -2876,6 +2953,7 @@ static noinline int split_leaf(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, int wret; int split; int num_doubles = 0; + int tried_avoid_double = 0; l = path->nodes[0]; slot = path->slots[0]; @@ -2884,12 +2962,14 @@ static noinline int split_leaf(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, return -EOVERFLOW; /* first try to make some room by pushing left and right */ - if (data_size && ins_key->type != BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY) { - wret = push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, data_size, 0); + if (data_size) { + wret = push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, data_size, + data_size, 0, 0); if (wret < 0) return wret; if (wret) { - wret = push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, data_size, 0); + wret = push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, data_size, + data_size, 0, (u32)-1); if (wret < 0) return wret; } @@ -2923,6 +3003,8 @@ again: if (mid != nritems && leaf_space_used(l, mid, nritems - mid) + data_size > BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(root)) { + if (data_size && !tried_avoid_double) + goto push_for_double; split = 2; } } @@ -2939,6 +3021,8 @@ again: if (mid != nritems && leaf_space_used(l, mid, nritems - mid) + data_size > BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(root)) { + if (data_size && !tried_avoid_double) + goto push_for_double; split = 2 ; } } @@ -3019,6 +3103,13 @@ again: } return ret; + +push_for_double: + push_for_double_split(trans, root, path, data_size); + tried_avoid_double = 1; + if (btrfs_leaf_free_space(root, path->nodes[0]) >= data_size) + return 0; + goto again; } static noinline int setup_leaf_for_split(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, @@ -3915,13 +4006,15 @@ int btrfs_del_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root, extent_buffer_get(leaf); btrfs_set_path_blocking(path); - wret = push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, 1, 1); + wret = push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, 1, 1, + 1, (u32)-1); if (wret < 0 && wret != -ENOSPC) ret = wret; if (path->nodes[0] == leaf && btrfs_header_nritems(leaf)) { - wret = push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, 1, 1); + wret = push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, 1, + 1, 1, 0); if (wret < 0 && wret != -ENOSPC) ret = wret; } -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2 From b5384d48f4e74edec3ca1887cb65e378a72af9a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sage Weil Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:31:14 +0000 Subject: Btrfs: fix CLONE ioctl destination file size expansion to block boundary The CLONE and CLONE_RANGE ioctls round up the range of extents being cloned to the block size when the range to clone extends to the end of file (this is always the case with CLONE). It was then using that offset when extending the destination file's i_size. Fix this by not setting i_size beyond the originally requested ending offset. This bug was introduced by a22285a6 (2.6.35-rc1). Signed-off-by: Sage Weil Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index 4dbaf89b133..2a8b3a7568a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -1578,6 +1578,7 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_clone(struct file *file, unsigned long srcfd, u64 disko = 0, diskl = 0; u64 datao = 0, datal = 0; u8 comp; + u64 endoff; size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot); read_extent_buffer(leaf, buf, @@ -1712,9 +1713,18 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_clone(struct file *file, unsigned long srcfd, btrfs_release_path(root, path); inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME; - if (new_key.offset + datal > inode->i_size) - btrfs_i_size_write(inode, - new_key.offset + datal); + + /* + * we round up to the block size at eof when + * determining which extents to clone above, + * but shouldn't round up the file size + */ + endoff = new_key.offset + datal; + if (endoff > off+olen) + endoff = off+olen; + if (endoff > inode->i_size) + btrfs_i_size_write(inode, endoff); + BTRFS_I(inode)->flags = BTRFS_I(src)->flags; ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode); BUG_ON(ret); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2 From 2ebc3464781ad24474abcbd2274e6254689853b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Rosenberg Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:58:20 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: fix checks in BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE 1. The BTRFS_IOC_CLONE and BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE ioctls should check whether the donor file is append-only before writing to it. 2. The BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE ioctl appears to have an integer overflow that allows a user to specify an out-of-bounds range to copy from the source file (if off + len wraps around). I haven't been able to successfully exploit this, but I'd imagine that a clever attacker could use this to read things he shouldn't. Even if it's not exploitable, it couldn't hurt to be safe. Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index 2a8b3a7568a..9254b3d58db 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_clone(struct file *file, unsigned long srcfd, */ /* the destination must be opened for writing */ - if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)) + if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) || (file->f_flags & O_APPEND)) return -EINVAL; ret = mnt_want_write(file->f_path.mnt); @@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_clone(struct file *file, unsigned long srcfd, /* determine range to clone */ ret = -EINVAL; - if (off >= src->i_size || off + len > src->i_size) + if (off + len > src->i_size || off + len < off) goto out_unlock; if (len == 0) olen = len = src->i_size - off; -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2