From a2a735ad666a04306a708b5a0109cc1fe113f569 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:54:11 +0200 Subject: ext2: Update comment about generic_osync_inode We rely on generic_write_sync() now. CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext2/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/ext2') diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c index e27130341d4..1c1638f873a 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int ext2_alloc_branch(struct inode *inode, unlock_buffer(bh); mark_buffer_dirty_inode(bh, inode); /* We used to sync bh here if IS_SYNC(inode). - * But we now rely upon generic_osync_inode() + * But we now rely upon generic_write_sync() * and b_inode_buffers. But not for directories. */ if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && IS_DIRSYNC(inode)) -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2