From 912a108da767ae75cc929d2854e698aff527ec5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NeilBrown Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:28:20 +1000 Subject: NFS: teach nfs_neg_need_reval to understand LOOKUP_RCU This requires nfs_check_verifier to take an rcu_walk flag, and requires an rcu version of nfs_revalidate_inode which returns -ECHILD rather than making an RPC call. With this, nfs_lookup_revalidate can call nfs_neg_need_reval in RCU-walk mode. We can also move the LOOKUP_RCU check past the nfs_check_verifier() call in nfs_lookup_revalidate. If RCU_WALK prevents nfs_check_verifier or nfs_neg_need_reval from doing a full check, they return a status indicating that a revalidation is required. As this revalidation will not be possible in RCU_WALK mode, -ECHILD will ultimately be returned, which is the desired result. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/inode.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs/nfs/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c index 9927913c97c..147fd17e792 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c @@ -1002,6 +1002,15 @@ int nfs_revalidate_inode(struct nfs_server *server, struct inode *inode) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_revalidate_inode); +int nfs_revalidate_inode_rcu(struct nfs_server *server, struct inode *inode) +{ + if (!(NFS_I(inode)->cache_validity & + (NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_INVALID_LABEL)) + && !nfs_attribute_cache_expired(inode)) + return NFS_STALE(inode) ? -ESTALE : 0; + return -ECHILD; +} + static int nfs_invalidate_mapping(struct inode *inode, struct address_space *mapping) { struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2