From 9ca941d4b62e72571948efe5a73c563b4cacc98d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiro SEKIBA Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:41:06 +0900 Subject: nilfs2: delete mark_inode_dirty in nilfs_new_inode It is redundant to call mark_inode_dirty() in nilfs_new_inode() because all caller of nilfs_new_inode() will call mark_inode_dirty() after calling nilfs_new_inode() directly or indirectly in transaction. Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi --- fs/nilfs2/inode.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/nilfs2/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c index a16c179f2b9..ede03752b96 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c @@ -323,7 +323,6 @@ struct inode *nilfs_new_inode(struct inode *dir, int mode) nilfs_init_acl(), proper cancellation of above jobs should be considered */ - mark_inode_dirty(inode); return inode; failed_acl: -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2