From 1fabe1481fac9e01bf8bffa60a2307ef379aa5de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:11:45 -0700 Subject: ocfs2: Remove struct ocfs2_journal_handle in favor of handle_t This is mostly a search and replace as ocfs2_journal_handle is now no more than a container for a handle_t pointer. ocfs2_commit_trans() becomes very straight forward, and we remove some out of date comments / code. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- fs/ocfs2/journal.h | 21 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/ocfs2/journal.h') diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/journal.h b/fs/ocfs2/journal.h index 3c0d15c5e49..d86cb960b7e 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/journal.h +++ b/fs/ocfs2/journal.h @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ enum ocfs2_journal_state { struct ocfs2_super; struct ocfs2_dinode; -struct ocfs2_journal_handle; struct ocfs2_journal { enum ocfs2_journal_state j_state; /* Journals current state */ @@ -133,10 +132,6 @@ static inline void ocfs2_inode_set_new(struct ocfs2_super *osb, spin_unlock(&trans_inc_lock); } -struct ocfs2_journal_handle { - handle_t *k_handle; /* kernel handle. */ -}; - /* Exported only for the journal struct init code in super.c. Do not call. */ void ocfs2_complete_recovery(void *data); @@ -200,7 +195,11 @@ static inline void ocfs2_checkpoint_inode(struct inode *inode) * ocfs2_start_trans - Begin a transaction. Give it an upper estimate of * the number of blocks that will be changed during * this handle. - * ocfs2_commit_trans - Complete a handle. + * ocfs2_commit_trans - Complete a handle. It might return -EIO if + * the journal was aborted. The majority of paths don't + * check the return value as an error there comes too + * late to do anything (and will be picked up in a + * later transaction). * ocfs2_extend_trans - Extend a handle by nblocks credits. This may * commit the handle to disk in the process, but will * not release any locks taken during the transaction. @@ -215,10 +214,10 @@ static inline void ocfs2_checkpoint_inode(struct inode *inode) /* You must always start_trans with a number of buffs > 0, but it's * perfectly legal to go through an entire transaction without having * dirtied any buffers. */ -struct ocfs2_journal_handle *ocfs2_start_trans(struct ocfs2_super *osb, +handle_t *ocfs2_start_trans(struct ocfs2_super *osb, int max_buffs); -void ocfs2_commit_trans(struct ocfs2_super *osb, - struct ocfs2_journal_handle *handle); +int ocfs2_commit_trans(struct ocfs2_super *osb, + handle_t *handle); int ocfs2_extend_trans(handle_t *handle, int nblocks); /* @@ -236,7 +235,7 @@ int ocfs2_extend_trans(handle_t *handle, int nblocks); #define OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE 1 #define OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_UNDO 2 -int ocfs2_journal_access(struct ocfs2_journal_handle *handle, +int ocfs2_journal_access(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *bh, int type); @@ -259,7 +258,7 @@ int ocfs2_journal_access(struct ocfs2_journal_handle *handle, * * ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, bh); */ -int ocfs2_journal_dirty(struct ocfs2_journal_handle *handle, +int ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh); int ocfs2_journal_dirty_data(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2