From c41564b5af328ea4600b26119f6c9c8e1eb5c28b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nathan Scott Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:55:14 +1000 Subject: [XFS] We really suck at spulling. Thanks to Chris Pascoe for fixing all these typos. SGI-PV: 904196 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:25539a Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott --- fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c') diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c index 2918956553a..8d056cef5d1 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ xfs_trans_mod_sb( case XFS_TRANS_SB_RES_FREXTENTS: /* * The allocation has already been applied to the - * in-core superblocks's counter. This should only + * in-core superblock's counter. This should only * be applied to the on-disk superblock. */ ASSERT(delta < 0); @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas( if (whole) /* - * Log the whole thing, the fields are discontiguous. + * Log the whole thing, the fields are noncontiguous. */ xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, bp, 0, sizeof(xfs_sb_t) - 1); else @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb( /* * Apply any superblock modifications to the in-core version. * The t_res_fdblocks_delta and t_res_frextents_delta fields are - * explicity NOT applied to the in-core superblock. + * explicitly NOT applied to the in-core superblock. * The idea is that that has already been done. */ if (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY) { -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2