From 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:55:58 -0500 Subject: Generic semaphore implementation Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and extensibility. Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep warning. Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the unlikely() was unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox Acked-by: Ingo Molnar --- include/asm-s390/semaphore.h | 108 +------------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 107 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/asm-s390') diff --git a/include/asm-s390/semaphore.h b/include/asm-s390/semaphore.h index 0e7001ad839..d9b2034ed1d 100644 --- a/include/asm-s390/semaphore.h +++ b/include/asm-s390/semaphore.h @@ -1,107 +1 @@ -/* - * include/asm-s390/semaphore.h - * - * S390 version - * Copyright (C) 1999 IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, IBM Corporation - * - * Derived from "include/asm-i386/semaphore.h" - * (C) Copyright 1996 Linus Torvalds - */ - -#ifndef _S390_SEMAPHORE_H -#define _S390_SEMAPHORE_H - -#include -#include -#include -#include - -struct semaphore { - /* - * Note that any negative value of count is equivalent to 0, - * but additionally indicates that some process(es) might be - * sleeping on `wait'. - */ - atomic_t count; - wait_queue_head_t wait; -}; - -#define __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(name,count) \ - { ATOMIC_INIT(count), __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER((name).wait) } - -#define __DECLARE_SEMAPHORE_GENERIC(name,count) \ - struct semaphore name = __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(name,count) - -#define DECLARE_MUTEX(name) __DECLARE_SEMAPHORE_GENERIC(name,1) - -static inline void sema_init (struct semaphore *sem, int val) -{ - atomic_set(&sem->count, val); - init_waitqueue_head(&sem->wait); -} - -static inline void init_MUTEX (struct semaphore *sem) -{ - sema_init(sem, 1); -} - -static inline void init_MUTEX_LOCKED (struct semaphore *sem) -{ - sema_init(sem, 0); -} - -asmlinkage void __down(struct semaphore * sem); -asmlinkage int __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem); -asmlinkage int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem); -asmlinkage void __up(struct semaphore * sem); - -static inline void down(struct semaphore * sem) -{ - might_sleep(); - if (atomic_dec_return(&sem->count) < 0) - __down(sem); -} - -static inline int down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem) -{ - int ret = 0; - - might_sleep(); - if (atomic_dec_return(&sem->count) < 0) - ret = __down_interruptible(sem); - return ret; -} - -static inline int down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem) -{ - int old_val, new_val; - - /* - * This inline assembly atomically implements the equivalent - * to the following C code: - * old_val = sem->count.counter; - * if ((new_val = old_val) > 0) - * sem->count.counter = --new_val; - * In the ppc code this is called atomic_dec_if_positive. - */ - asm volatile( - " l %0,0(%3)\n" - "0: ltr %1,%0\n" - " jle 1f\n" - " ahi %1,-1\n" - " cs %0,%1,0(%3)\n" - " jl 0b\n" - "1:" - : "=&d" (old_val), "=&d" (new_val), "=m" (sem->count.counter) - : "a" (&sem->count.counter), "m" (sem->count.counter) - : "cc", "memory"); - return old_val <= 0; -} - -static inline void up(struct semaphore * sem) -{ - if (atomic_inc_return(&sem->count) <= 0) - __up(sem); -} - -#endif +#include -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2