From 1ad434d7cf5f490c71cfbbb2fb91076c01c8704e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Russell King Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:42:21 +0100 Subject: [MMC] Use class device name for mmc host name There's no point in having the host name duplicated between the mmc_host structure and the encapsulated class device structure. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- include/linux/mmc/host.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/mmc') diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h index a74a810a130..113cc27865f 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h @@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ struct mmc_host { unsigned int f_min; unsigned int f_max; u32 ocr_avail; - char host_name[8]; /* host specific block data */ unsigned int max_seg_size; /* see blk_queue_max_segment_size */ @@ -98,7 +97,7 @@ extern void mmc_free_host(struct mmc_host *); #define mmc_priv(x) ((void *)((x) + 1)) #define mmc_dev(x) ((x)->dev) -#define mmc_hostname(x) ((x)->host_name) +#define mmc_hostname(x) ((x)->class_dev.class_id) extern int mmc_suspend_host(struct mmc_host *, pm_message_t); extern int mmc_resume_host(struct mmc_host *); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2