From c540521bba5d2f24bd2c0417157bfaf8b85e2eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 11:23:24 -0700 Subject: security: Minor improvements to no_new_privs documentation The documentation didn't actually mention how to enable no_new_privs. This also adds a note about possible interactions between no_new_privs and LSMs (i.e. why teaching systemd to set no_new_privs is not necessarily a good idea), and it references the new docs from include/linux/prctl.h. Suggested-by: Rob Landley Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Acked-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: James Morris --- include/linux/prctl.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'include') diff --git a/include/linux/prctl.h b/include/linux/prctl.h index 3988012255d..289760f424a 100644 --- a/include/linux/prctl.h +++ b/include/linux/prctl.h @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ * Changing LSM security domain is considered a new privilege. So, for example, * asking selinux for a specific new context (e.g. with runcon) will result * in execve returning -EPERM. + * + * See Documentation/prctl/no_new_privs.txt for more details. */ #define PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS 38 #define PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS 39 -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2