From b8534d7bd89df0cd41cd47bcd6733a05ea9a691a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:38:53 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] taskstats: kill ->taskstats_lock in favor of ->siglock

signal_struct is (mostly) protected by ->sighand->siglock, I think we don't
need ->taskstats_lock to protect ->stats.  This also allows us to simplify the
locking in fill_tgid().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
---
 kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'kernel/fork.c')

diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 213326609ba..3da978eec79 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static inline int copy_signal(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct * ts
 	if (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD) {
 		atomic_inc(&current->signal->count);
 		atomic_inc(&current->signal->live);
-		taskstats_tgid_alloc(current->signal);
+		taskstats_tgid_alloc(current);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	sig = kmem_cache_alloc(signal_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2