From 2ed0e645f358c26f4f4a7aed56a9488db0020ad1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Zyngier Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:27:39 +0000 Subject: genirq: Don't allow per cpu interrupts to be suspended The power management functions related to interrupts do not know (yet) about per-cpu interrupts and end up calling the wrong low-level methods to enable/disable interrupts. This leads to all kind of interesting issues (action taken on one CPU only, updating a refcount which is not used otherwise...). The workaround for the time being is simply to flag these interrupts with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND. At least on ARM, these interrupts are actually dealt with at the architecture level. Reported-by: Santosh Shilimkar Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1321446459-31409-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/irq') diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c index 67ce837ae52..0e2b179bc7b 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c @@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ int request_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, return -ENOMEM; action->handler = handler; - action->flags = IRQF_PERCPU; + action->flags = IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND; action->name = devname; action->percpu_dev_id = dev_id; -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2