From 58a69cb47ec6991bf006a3e5d202e8571b0327a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:25:31 +0100 Subject: workqueue, freezer: unify spelling of 'freeze' + 'able' to 'freezable' There are two spellings in use for 'freeze' + 'able' - 'freezable' and 'freezeable'. The former is the more prominent one. The latter is mostly used by workqueue and in a few other odd places. Unify the spelling to 'freezable'. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reported-by: Alan Stern Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: David Woodhouse Cc: Alex Dubov Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Steven Whitehouse --- kernel/power/process.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/power/process.c') diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c index d6d2a10320e..0cf3a27a6c9 100644 --- a/kernel/power/process.c +++ b/kernel/power/process.c @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ */ #define TIMEOUT (20 * HZ) -static inline int freezeable(struct task_struct * p) +static inline int freezable(struct task_struct * p) { if ((p == current) || (p->flags & PF_NOFREEZE) || @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool sig_only) todo = 0; read_lock(&tasklist_lock); do_each_thread(g, p) { - if (frozen(p) || !freezeable(p)) + if (frozen(p) || !freezable(p)) continue; if (!freeze_task(p, sig_only)) @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static void thaw_tasks(bool nosig_only) read_lock(&tasklist_lock); do_each_thread(g, p) { - if (!freezeable(p)) + if (!freezable(p)) continue; if (nosig_only && should_send_signal(p)) -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2