From 31e6d363abcd0d05766c82f1a9c905a4c974a199 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:05:41 -0700 Subject: net: correct off-by-one write allocations reports commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80 (net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx) changed initial sk_wmem_alloc value. We need to take into account this offset when reporting sk_wmem_alloc to user, in PROC_FS files or various ioctls (SIOCOUTQ/TIOCOUTQ) Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/sctp/socket.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/sctp') diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 0f01e5d8a24..35ba035970a 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static inline int sctp_wspace(struct sctp_association *asoc) if (asoc->ep->sndbuf_policy) amt = asoc->sndbuf_used; else - amt = atomic_read(&asoc->base.sk->sk_wmem_alloc); + amt = sk_wmem_alloc_get(asoc->base.sk); if (amt >= asoc->base.sk->sk_sndbuf) { if (asoc->base.sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK) @@ -6523,7 +6523,7 @@ static int sctp_writeable(struct sock *sk) { int amt = 0; - amt = sk->sk_sndbuf - atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc); + amt = sk->sk_sndbuf - sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk); if (amt < 0) amt = 0; return amt; -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2