From ebc3f64b864fc16a594c2e63bf55a55c7d42084b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shaun Pereira Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:16:17 -0700 Subject: [X25]: Fast select with no restriction on response This patch is a follow up to patch 1 regarding "Selective Sub Address matching with call user data". It allows use of the Fast-Select-Acceptance optional user facility for X.25. This patch just implements fast select with no restriction on response (NRR). What this means (according to ITU-T Recomendation 10/96 section 6.16) is that if in an incoming call packet, the relevant facility bits are set for fast-select-NRR, then the called DTE can issue a direct response to the incoming packet using a call-accepted packet that contains call-user-data. This patch allows such a response. The called DTE can also respond with a clear-request packet that contains call-user-data. However, this feature is currently not implemented by the patch. How is Fast Select Acceptance used? By default, the system does not allow fast select acceptance (as before). To enable a response to fast select acceptance, After a listen socket in created and bound as follows socket(AF_X25, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0); bind(call_soc, (struct sockaddr *)&locl_addr, sizeof(locl_addr)); but before a listen system call is made, the following ioctl should be used. ioctl(call_soc,SIOCX25CALLACCPTAPPRV); Now the listen system call can be made listen(call_soc, 4); After this, an incoming-call packet will be accepted, but no call-accepted packet will be sent back until the following system call is made on the socket that accepts the call ioctl(vc_soc,SIOCX25SENDCALLACCPT); The network (or cisco xot router used for testing here) will allow the application server's call-user-data in the call-accepted packet, provided the call-request was made with Fast-select NRR. Signed-off-by: Shaun Pereira Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/x25/x25_facilities.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/x25/x25_facilities.c') diff --git a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c index a21bdb95f9a..54278b962f4 100644 --- a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c +++ b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ * X.25 001 Split from x25_subr.c * mar/20/00 Daniela Squassoni Disabling/enabling of facilities * negotiation. + * apr/14/05 Shaun Pereira - Allow fast select with no restriction + * on response. */ #include @@ -43,9 +45,31 @@ int x25_parse_facilities(struct sk_buff *skb, case X25_FAC_CLASS_A: switch (*p) { case X25_FAC_REVERSE: - facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x01; - *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE; - break; + if((p[1] & 0x81) == 0x81) { + facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x81; + *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE; + break; + } + + if((p[1] & 0x01) == 0x01) { + facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x01; + *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE; + break; + } + + if((p[1] & 0x80) == 0x80) { + facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x80; + *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE; + break; + } + + if(p[1] == 0x00) { + facilities->reverse + = X25_DEFAULT_REVERSE; + *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE; + break; + } + case X25_FAC_THROUGHPUT: facilities->throughput = p[1]; *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_THROUGHPUT; @@ -122,7 +146,7 @@ int x25_create_facilities(unsigned char *buffer, if (facilities->reverse && (facil_mask & X25_MASK_REVERSE)) { *p++ = X25_FAC_REVERSE; - *p++ = !!facilities->reverse; + *p++ = facilities->reverse; } if (facilities->throughput && (facil_mask & X25_MASK_THROUGHPUT)) { @@ -171,7 +195,7 @@ int x25_negotiate_facilities(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk, /* * They want reverse charging, we won't accept it. */ - if (theirs.reverse && ours->reverse) { + if ((theirs.reverse & 0x01 ) && (ours->reverse & 0x01)) { SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "X.25: rejecting reverse charging request"); return -1; } -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2