From bb52c7acf871537a468433775151339f783d2e8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:28:51 +0000 Subject: netem: dont call vfree() under spinlock and BH disabled commit 6373a9a286 (netem: use vmalloc for distribution table) added a regression, since vfree() is called while holding a spinlock and BH being disabled. Fix this by doing the pointers swap in critical section, and freeing after spinlock release. Also add __GFP_NOWARN to the kmalloc() try, since we fallback to vmalloc(). Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/sched/sch_netem.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'net') diff --git a/net/sched/sch_netem.c b/net/sched/sch_netem.c index eb3b9a86c6e..a4ab207cdc5 100644 --- a/net/sched/sch_netem.c +++ b/net/sched/sch_netem.c @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int get_dist_table(struct Qdisc *sch, const struct nlattr *attr) return -EINVAL; s = sizeof(struct disttable) + n * sizeof(s16); - d = kmalloc(s, GFP_KERNEL); + d = kmalloc(s, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN); if (!d) d = vmalloc(s); if (!d) @@ -501,9 +501,10 @@ static int get_dist_table(struct Qdisc *sch, const struct nlattr *attr) root_lock = qdisc_root_sleeping_lock(sch); spin_lock_bh(root_lock); - dist_free(q->delay_dist); - q->delay_dist = d; + swap(q->delay_dist, d); spin_unlock_bh(root_lock); + + dist_free(d); return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2