From 9e48858f7d36a6a3849f1d1b40c3bf5624b4ee7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Molnar Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 19:26:19 +1000 Subject: security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check The ->ptrace_may_access() methods are named confusingly - the real ptrace_may_access() returns a bool, while these security checks have a retval convention. Rename it to ptrace_access_check, to reduce the confusion factor. [ Impact: cleanup, no code changed ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: James Morris --- security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'security/smack') diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c index 0023182078c..1c9bdbcbe3d 100644 --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct inode_smack *new_inode_smack(char *smack) */ /** - * smack_ptrace_may_access - Smack approval on PTRACE_ATTACH + * smack_ptrace_access_check - Smack approval on PTRACE_ATTACH * @ctp: child task pointer * @mode: ptrace attachment mode * @@ -99,13 +99,13 @@ struct inode_smack *new_inode_smack(char *smack) * * Do the capability checks, and require read and write. */ -static int smack_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *ctp, unsigned int mode) +static int smack_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *ctp, unsigned int mode) { int rc; struct smk_audit_info ad; char *sp, *tsp; - rc = cap_ptrace_may_access(ctp, mode); + rc = cap_ptrace_access_check(ctp, mode); if (rc != 0) return rc; @@ -3032,7 +3032,7 @@ static void smack_release_secctx(char *secdata, u32 seclen) struct security_operations smack_ops = { .name = "smack", - .ptrace_may_access = smack_ptrace_may_access, + .ptrace_access_check = smack_ptrace_access_check, .ptrace_traceme = smack_ptrace_traceme, .syslog = smack_syslog, -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2