diff options
| author | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> | 2008-08-05 18:46:57 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2008-08-05 18:46:57 -0700 |
| commit | ffb208479bd62ab26c29a242faeb1de1c6d5fcdc (patch) | |
| tree | a825cbc6d7ec125cab86e32008acf816c7bb2bc8 | |
| parent | ff2a79a5a934fe0dbb136ffad61f79b5c6385614 (diff) | |
AX.25: Fix sysctl registration if !CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE
Since 49ffcf8f99e8d33ec8afb450956804af518fd788 ("sysctl: update
sysctl_check_table") setting struct ctl_table.procname = NULL does no
longer work as it used to the way the AX.25 code is expecting it to
resulting in the AX.25 sysctl registration code to break if
CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE was not set as in some distribution kernels.
Kernel releases from 2.6.24 are affected.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c b/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c index f597987b242..f288fc4aef9 100644 --- a/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c +++ b/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static struct ctl_path ax25_path[] = { { .procname = "ax25", .ctl_name = NET_AX25, }, { } }; + static const ctl_table ax25_param_table[] = { { .ctl_name = NET_AX25_IP_DEFAULT_MODE, @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ static const ctl_table ax25_param_table[] = { .extra1 = &min_proto, .extra2 = &max_proto }, +#ifdef CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE { .ctl_name = NET_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE_TIMEOUT, .procname = "dama_slave_timeout", @@ -177,6 +179,8 @@ static const ctl_table ax25_param_table[] = { .extra1 = &min_ds_timeout, .extra2 = &max_ds_timeout }, +#endif + { .ctl_name = 0 } /* that's all, folks! */ }; @@ -210,16 +214,6 @@ void ax25_register_sysctl(void) ax25_table[n].procname = ax25_dev->dev->name; ax25_table[n].mode = 0555; -#ifndef CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE - /* - * We do not wish to have a representation of this parameter - * in /proc/sys/ when configured *not* to include the - * AX.25 DAMA slave code, do we? - */ - - child[AX25_VALUES_DS_TIMEOUT].procname = NULL; -#endif - child[AX25_MAX_VALUES].ctl_name = 0; /* just in case... */ for (k = 0; k < AX25_MAX_VALUES; k++) |