diff options
author | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2013-12-09 09:17:02 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2013-12-09 09:19:14 +0100 |
commit | f7698ba75fa283435f5077b9dfb4319d28b9de9a (patch) | |
tree | 4bc16a615a35baaf2b482de81cd256a69067ff72 /arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c | |
parent | 798183c54799fbe1e5a5bfabb3a8c0505ffd2149 (diff) | |
parent | 374b105797c3d4f29c685f3be535c35f5689b30e (diff) |
Merge tag 'v3.13-rc3' into drm-intel-next-queued
Linux 3.13-rc3
I need a backmerge for two reasons:
- For merging the ppgtt patches from Ben I need to pull in the bdw
support.
- We now have duplicated calls to intel_uncore_forcewake_reset in the
setup code to due 2 different patches merged into -next and 3.13.
The conflict is silen so I need the merge to be able to apply
Deepak's fixup patch.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
Trivial conflict, it doesn't even show up in the merge diff.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c | 41 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c index 025f742dd4d..3e58d710013 100644 --- a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c +++ b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include <linux/hardirq.h> /* for in_atomic() */ #include <linux/gfp.h> #include <linux/highmem.h> +#include <linux/hugetlb.h> #include <asm/current.h> #include <asm/page.h> @@ -40,7 +41,35 @@ pin_page_for_write(const void __user *_addr, pte_t **ptep, spinlock_t **ptlp) return 0; pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); - if (unlikely(pmd_none(*pmd) || pmd_bad(*pmd))) + if (unlikely(pmd_none(*pmd))) + return 0; + + /* + * A pmd can be bad if it refers to a HugeTLB or THP page. + * + * Both THP and HugeTLB pages have the same pmd layout + * and should not be manipulated by the pte functions. + * + * Lock the page table for the destination and check + * to see that it's still huge and whether or not we will + * need to fault on write, or if we have a splitting THP. + */ + if (unlikely(pmd_thp_or_huge(*pmd))) { + ptl = ¤t->mm->page_table_lock; + spin_lock(ptl); + if (unlikely(!pmd_thp_or_huge(*pmd) + || pmd_hugewillfault(*pmd) + || pmd_trans_splitting(*pmd))) { + spin_unlock(ptl); + return 0; + } + + *ptep = NULL; + *ptlp = ptl; + return 1; + } + + if (unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd))) return 0; pte = pte_offset_map_lock(current->mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); @@ -94,7 +123,10 @@ __copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) from += tocopy; n -= tocopy; - pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl); + if (pte) + pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl); + else + spin_unlock(ptl); } if (!atomic) up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem); @@ -147,7 +179,10 @@ __clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) addr += tocopy; n -= tocopy; - pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl); + if (pte) + pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl); + else + spin_unlock(ptl); } up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem); |