diff options
author | Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> | 2007-02-07 01:47:59 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> | 2007-02-07 01:47:59 -0600 |
commit | 5fad293bcbd48d9a2370020cf60e4b4a42559b12 (patch) | |
tree | f6bb8c466410dead0471583ec874ca3244c3902b /arch/powerpc/kernel | |
parent | 04903a30a327513b97c1271fc6bc4dad6502d1b8 (diff) |
[POWERPC] Fixup error handling when emulating a floating point instruction
When we do full FP emulation its possible that we need to post a SIGFPE based
on the results of the emulation. The previous code ignored this case completely.
Additionally, the Soft_emulate_8xx case had two issues. One, we should never
generate a SIGFPE since the code only does data movement. Second, we were
interpreting the return codes incorrectly, it returns 0 on success, 1 on
illop and -EFAULT on a data access error.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 82 |
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c index f038caa3c2b..dcc6f159fd9 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c @@ -535,34 +535,40 @@ static void emulate_single_step(struct pt_regs *regs) } } -static void parse_fpe(struct pt_regs *regs) +static inline int __parse_fpscr(unsigned long fpscr) { - int code = 0; - unsigned long fpscr; - - flush_fp_to_thread(current); - - fpscr = current->thread.fpscr.val; + int ret = 0; /* Invalid operation */ if ((fpscr & FPSCR_VE) && (fpscr & FPSCR_VX)) - code = FPE_FLTINV; + ret = FPE_FLTINV; /* Overflow */ else if ((fpscr & FPSCR_OE) && (fpscr & FPSCR_OX)) - code = FPE_FLTOVF; + ret = FPE_FLTOVF; /* Underflow */ else if ((fpscr & FPSCR_UE) && (fpscr & FPSCR_UX)) - code = FPE_FLTUND; + ret = FPE_FLTUND; /* Divide by zero */ else if ((fpscr & FPSCR_ZE) && (fpscr & FPSCR_ZX)) - code = FPE_FLTDIV; + ret = FPE_FLTDIV; /* Inexact result */ else if ((fpscr & FPSCR_XE) && (fpscr & FPSCR_XX)) - code = FPE_FLTRES; + ret = FPE_FLTRES; + + return ret; +} + +static void parse_fpe(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + int code = 0; + + flush_fp_to_thread(current); + + code = __parse_fpscr(current->thread.fpscr.val); _exception(SIGFPE, regs, code, regs->nip); } @@ -773,10 +779,21 @@ void __kprobes program_check_exception(struct pt_regs *regs) * hardware people - not sure if it can happen on any illegal * instruction or only on FP instructions, whether there is a * pattern to occurences etc. -dgibson 31/Mar/2003 */ - if (do_mathemu(regs) == 0) { + switch (do_mathemu(regs)) { + case 0: emulate_single_step(regs); return; + case 1: { + int code = 0; + code = __parse_fpscr(current->thread.fpscr.val); + _exception(SIGFPE, regs, code, regs->nip); + return; + } + case -EFAULT: + _exception(SIGSEGV, regs, SEGV_MAPERR, regs->nip); + return; } + /* fall through on any other errors */ #endif /* CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION */ /* Try to emulate it if we should. */ @@ -892,18 +909,39 @@ void SoftwareEmulation(struct pt_regs *regs) #ifdef CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION errcode = do_mathemu(regs); + + switch (errcode) { + case 0: + emulate_single_step(regs); + return; + case 1: { + int code = 0; + code = __parse_fpscr(current->thread.fpscr.val); + _exception(SIGFPE, regs, code, regs->nip); + return; + } + case -EFAULT: + _exception(SIGSEGV, regs, SEGV_MAPERR, regs->nip); + return; + default: + _exception(SIGILL, regs, ILL_ILLOPC, regs->nip); + return; + } + #else errcode = Soft_emulate_8xx(regs); -#endif - if (errcode) { - if (errcode > 0) - _exception(SIGFPE, regs, 0, 0); - else if (errcode == -EFAULT) - _exception(SIGSEGV, regs, 0, 0); - else - _exception(SIGILL, regs, ILL_ILLOPC, regs->nip); - } else + switch (errcode) { + case 0: emulate_single_step(regs); + return; + case 1: + _exception(SIGILL, regs, ILL_ILLOPC, regs->nip); + return; + case -EFAULT: + _exception(SIGSEGV, regs, SEGV_MAPERR, regs->nip); + return; + } +#endif } #endif /* CONFIG_8xx */ |