Merge remote-tracking branch 'airlied/drm-core-next' into drm-intel-next-queued

Backmerge of drm-next to resolve a few ugly conflicts and to get a few
fixes from 3.4-rc6 (which drm-next has already merged). Note that this
merge also restricts the stencil cache lra evict policy workaround to
snb (as it should) - I had to frob the code anyway because the
CM0_MASK_SHIFT define died in the masked bit cleanups.

We need the backmerge to get Paulo Zanoni's infoframe regression fix
for gm45 - further bugfixes from him touch the same area and would
needlessly conflict.

Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

1 files changed, 24 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index 0a44b90602b..146bb6218ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@
  *	contact AMD for precise details and a CPU swap.
  *
  *	See	http://www.multimania.com/poulot/k6bug.html
- *		http://www.amd.com/K6/k6docs/revgd.html
+ *	and	section 2.6.2 of "AMD-K6 Processor Revision Guide - Model 6"
+ *		(Publication # 21266  Issue Date: August 1998)
  *
  *	The following test is erm.. interesting. AMD neglected to up
  *	the chip setting when fixing the bug but they also tweaked some
@@ -94,7 +95,6 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd_k6(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 				"system stability may be impaired when more than 32 MB are used.\n");
 		else
 			printk(KERN_CONT "probably OK (after B9730xxxx).\n");
-		printk(KERN_INFO "Please see http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html\n");
 	}
 
 	/* K6 with old style WHCR */
@@ -353,10 +353,11 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu);
 
 	/*
-	 * If core numbers are inconsistent, it's likely a multi-fabric platform,
-	 * so invoke platform-specific handler
+	 * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a
+	 * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some
+	 * IDs of the CPU.
 	 */
-	if (c->phys_proc_id != node)
+	if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id)
 		x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node);
 
 	if (!node_online(node)) {
@@ -579,6 +580,24 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* re-enable TopologyExtensions if switched off by BIOS */
+	if ((c->x86 == 0x15) &&
+	    (c->x86_model >= 0x10) && (c->x86_model <= 0x1f) &&
+	    !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
+		u64 val;
+
+		if (!rdmsrl_amd_safe(0xc0011005, &val)) {
+			val |= 1ULL << 54;
+			wrmsrl_amd_safe(0xc0011005, val);
+			rdmsrl(0xc0011005, val);
+			if (val & (1ULL << 54)) {
+				set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT);
+				printk(KERN_INFO FW_INFO "CPU: Re-enabling "
+				  "disabled Topology Extensions Support\n");
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
 	cpu_detect_cache_sizes(c);
 
 	/* Multi core CPU? */