Merge tag 'v3.4-rc6' into drm-intel-next

Conflicts:
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c

Ok, this is a fun story of git totally messing things up. There
/shouldn't/ be any conflict in here, because the fixes in -rc6 do only
touch functions that have not been changed in -next.

The offending commits in drm-next are 14415745b2..1fa611065 which
simply move a few functions from intel_display.c to intel_pm.c. The
problem seems to be that git diff gets completely confused:

$ git diff 14415745b2..1fa611065

is a nice mess in intel_display.c, and the diff leaks into totally
unrelated functions, whereas

$git diff --minimal  14415745b2..1fa611065

is exactly what we want.

Unfortunately there seems to be no way to teach similar smarts to the
merge diff and conflict generation code, because with the minimal diff
there really shouldn't be any conflicts. For added hilarity, every
time something in that area changes the + and - lines in the diff move
around like crazy, again resulting in new conflicts. So I fear this
mess will stay with us for a little longer (and might result in
another backmerge down the road).

Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index 1d661b5c328..eb6fd233764 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -28,23 +28,33 @@
 #include "internal.h"
 #include "sleep.h"
 
+u8 wake_sleep_flags = ACPI_NO_OPTIONAL_METHODS;
 static unsigned int gts, bfs;
-module_param(gts, uint, 0644);
-module_param(bfs, uint, 0644);
-MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
-MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
-
-static u8 wake_sleep_flags(void)
+static int set_param_wake_flag(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp)
 {
-	u8 flags = ACPI_NO_OPTIONAL_METHODS;
+	int ret = param_set_int(val, kp);
 
-	if (gts)
-		flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
-	if (bfs)
-		flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
-	return flags;
+	if (kp->arg == (const char *)&gts) {
+		if (gts)
+			wake_sleep_flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
+		else
+			wake_sleep_flags &= ~ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
+	}
+	if (kp->arg == (const char *)&bfs) {
+		if (bfs)
+			wake_sleep_flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
+		else
+			wake_sleep_flags &= ~ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
+	}
+	return ret;
 }
+module_param_call(gts, set_param_wake_flag, param_get_int, &gts, 0644);
+module_param_call(bfs, set_param_wake_flag, param_get_int, &bfs, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
 
 static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
 
@@ -263,7 +273,6 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
 {
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 	u32 acpi_state = acpi_target_sleep_state;
-	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
 	int error;
 
 	ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
@@ -271,7 +280,7 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
 	switch (acpi_state) {
 	case ACPI_STATE_S1:
 		barrier();
-		status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(acpi_state, flags);
+		status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(acpi_state, wake_sleep_flags);
 		break;
 
 	case ACPI_STATE_S3:
@@ -286,7 +295,7 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
 	acpi_write_bit_register(ACPI_BITREG_SCI_ENABLE, 1);
 
 	/* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
-	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(acpi_state, flags);
+	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(acpi_state, wake_sleep_flags);
 
 	/* ACPI 3.0 specs (P62) says that it's the responsibility
 	 * of the OSPM to clear the status bit [ implying that the
@@ -550,30 +559,27 @@ static int acpi_hibernation_begin(void)
 
 static int acpi_hibernation_enter(void)
 {
-	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 
 	ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
 
 	/* This shouldn't return.  If it returns, we have a problem */
-	status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
+	status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
 	/* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
-	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
+	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
 
 	return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ? 0 : -EFAULT;
 }
 
 static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
 {
-	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
-
 	/*
 	 * If ACPI is not enabled by the BIOS and the boot kernel, we need to
 	 * enable it here.
 	 */
 	acpi_enable();
 	/* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
-	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
+	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
 	/* Check the hardware signature */
 	if (facs && s4_hardware_signature != facs->hardware_signature) {
 		printk(KERN_EMERG "ACPI: Hardware changed while hibernated, "
@@ -828,12 +834,10 @@ static void acpi_power_off_prepare(void)
 
 static void acpi_power_off(void)
 {
-	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
-
 	/* acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S5) should have already been called */
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s called\n", __func__);
 	local_irq_disable();
-	acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5, flags);
+	acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5, wake_sleep_flags);
 }
 
 /*