summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>2007-12-18 16:34:43 -0500
committerJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>2008-01-23 05:24:14 -0500
commit0dc36888d4422140f9eaf50f24953ec109f750a3 (patch)
tree80253b1831849e4063b73c31c15011c5e4c48404 /drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
parent537b53c1692960b8b3b0324e886fbe48cb9e5c00 (diff)
libata: rename ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* to ATAPI_PROT_*
ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are ugly and naming schemes between ATA_PROT_* and ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are inconsistent causing confusion. Rename them to ATAPI_PROT_* and make them consistent with ATA counterpart. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/ata/libata-eh.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/ata/libata-eh.c8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 1bc1acf3bbb..419552603a1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -1299,10 +1299,10 @@ static unsigned int atapi_eh_request_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
/* is it pointless to prefer PIO for "safety reasons"? */
if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_PIO_DMA) {
- tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA;
+ tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_DMA;
tf.feature |= ATAPI_PKT_DMA;
} else {
- tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI;
+ tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_PIO;
tf.lbam = SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE;
tf.lbah = 0;
}
@@ -1979,8 +1979,8 @@ static void ata_eh_link_report(struct ata_link *link)
[ATA_PROT_PIO] = "pio",
[ATA_PROT_DMA] = "dma",
[ATA_PROT_NCQ] = "ncq",
- [ATA_PROT_ATAPI] = "pio",
- [ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA] = "dma",
+ [ATAPI_PROT_PIO] = "pio",
+ [ATAPI_PROT_DMA] = "dma",
};
snprintf(data_buf, sizeof(data_buf), " %s %u %s",