diff options
| author | Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@samsung.com> | 2012-07-20 02:54:02 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> | 2012-07-20 11:58:34 +0200 |
| commit | 53df1ad52545854fc34d336b26f3086b2fb2d6f7 (patch) | |
| tree | b861a4e6f166e6accf9bcaf0a60a95d73acd5ba4 /drivers/cpufreq | |
| parent | 84a1caf1453c3d44050bd22db958af4a7f99315c (diff) | |
EXYNOS: bugfix on retrieving old_index from freqs.old
The policy might have been changed since last call of target().
Thus, using cpufreq_frequency_table_target(), which depends on
policy to find the corresponding index from a frequency, may return
inconsistent index for freqs.old. Thus, old_index should be
calculated not based on the current policy.
We have been observing such issue when scaling_min/max_freq were
updated and sometimes cuased system lockups deu to incorrectly
configured voltages.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index b243a7ee01f..af2d81e10f7 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c @@ -62,8 +62,18 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, goto out; } - if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table, - freqs.old, relation, &old_index)) { + /* + * The policy max have been changed so that we cannot get proper + * old_index with cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). Thus, ignore + * policy and get the index from the raw freqeuncy table. + */ + for (old_index = 0; + freq_table[old_index].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; + old_index++) + if (freq_table[old_index].frequency == freqs.old) + break; + + if (freq_table[old_index].frequency == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out; } |