Merge branch 'sh/stable-updates'

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S b/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S
index 3fc15318a80..40634b0db9f 100644
--- a/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S
+++ b/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S
@@ -1,12 +1,15 @@
-/*P:900 This is the Switcher: code which sits at 0xFFC00000 astride both the
- * Host and Guest to do the low-level Guest<->Host switch.  It is as simple as
- * it can be made, but it's naturally very specific to x86.
+/*P:900
+ * This is the Switcher: code which sits at 0xFFC00000 (or 0xFFE00000) astride
+ * both the Host and Guest to do the low-level Guest<->Host switch.  It is as
+ * simple as it can be made, but it's naturally very specific to x86.
  *
  * You have now completed Preparation.  If this has whet your appetite; if you
  * are feeling invigorated and refreshed then the next, more challenging stage
- * can be found in "make Guest". :*/
+ * can be found in "make Guest".
+ :*/
 
-/*M:012 Lguest is meant to be simple: my rule of thumb is that 1% more LOC must
+/*M:012
+ * Lguest is meant to be simple: my rule of thumb is that 1% more LOC must
  * gain at least 1% more performance.  Since neither LOC nor performance can be
  * measured beforehand, it generally means implementing a feature then deciding
  * if it's worth it.  And once it's implemented, who can say no?
@@ -31,11 +34,14 @@
  * Host (which is actually really easy).
  *
  * Two questions remain.  Would the performance gain outweigh the complexity?
- * And who would write the verse documenting it? :*/
+ * And who would write the verse documenting it?
+:*/
 
-/*M:011 Lguest64 handles NMI.  This gave me NMI envy (until I looked at their
+/*M:011
+ * Lguest64 handles NMI.  This gave me NMI envy (until I looked at their
  * code).  It's worth doing though, since it would let us use oprofile in the
- * Host when a Guest is running. :*/
+ * Host when a Guest is running.
+:*/
 
 /*S:100
  * Welcome to the Switcher itself!