Merge tty-next into 3.6-rc1

This handles the merge issue in:
	arch/um/drivers/line.c
	arch/um/drivers/line.h
And resolves the duplicate patches that were in both trees do to the
tty-next branch not getting merged into 3.6-rc1.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index c2bbe1fb132..1e519195d45 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1710,3 +1710,39 @@ int __invalidate_device(struct block_device *bdev, bool kill_dirty)
 	return res;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__invalidate_device);
+
+void iterate_bdevs(void (*func)(struct block_device *, void *), void *arg)
+{
+	struct inode *inode, *old_inode = NULL;
+
+	spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(inode, &blockdev_superblock->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
+		struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
+
+		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+		if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW) ||
+		    mapping->nrpages == 0) {
+			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+			continue;
+		}
+		__iget(inode);
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
+		/*
+		 * We hold a reference to 'inode' so it couldn't have been
+		 * removed from s_inodes list while we dropped the
+		 * inode_sb_list_lock.  We cannot iput the inode now as we can
+		 * be holding the last reference and we cannot iput it under
+		 * inode_sb_list_lock. So we keep the reference and iput it
+		 * later.
+		 */
+		iput(old_inode);
+		old_inode = inode;
+
+		func(I_BDEV(inode), arg);
+
+		spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
+	iput(old_inode);
+}