diff options
author | H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> | 2012-10-19 07:54:24 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> | 2012-10-19 07:55:09 -0700 |
commit | 4533d86270d7986e00594495dde9a109d6be27ae (patch) | |
tree | c2473cac653f7b98e5bd5e6475e63734be4b7644 /fs/jbd2/commit.c | |
parent | 21c5e50e15b1abd797e62f18fd7f90b9cc004cbd (diff) | |
parent | 5bc66170dc486556a1e36fd384463536573f4b82 (diff) |
Merge commit '5bc66170dc486556a1e36fd384463536573f4b82' into x86/urgent
From Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>:
Below is a RAS fix which reverts the addition of a sysfs attribute
which we agreed is not needed, post-factum. And this should go in now
because that sysfs attribute is going to end up in 3.7 otherwise and
thus exposed to userspace; removing it then would be a lot harder.
This is done as a merge rather than a simple patch/cherry-pick since
the baseline for this patch was not in the previous x86/urgent.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jbd2/commit.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/jbd2/commit.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c index af5280fb579..3091d42992f 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c @@ -1014,17 +1014,35 @@ restart_loop: * there's no point in keeping a checkpoint record for * it. */ - /* A buffer which has been freed while still being - * journaled by a previous transaction may end up still - * being dirty here, but we want to avoid writing back - * that buffer in the future after the "add to orphan" - * operation been committed, That's not only a performance - * gain, it also stops aliasing problems if the buffer is - * left behind for writeback and gets reallocated for another - * use in a different page. */ - if (buffer_freed(bh) && !jh->b_next_transaction) { - clear_buffer_freed(bh); - clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh); + /* + * A buffer which has been freed while still being journaled by + * a previous transaction. + */ + if (buffer_freed(bh)) { + /* + * If the running transaction is the one containing + * "add to orphan" operation (b_next_transaction != + * NULL), we have to wait for that transaction to + * commit before we can really get rid of the buffer. + * So just clear b_modified to not confuse transaction + * credit accounting and refile the buffer to + * BJ_Forget of the running transaction. If the just + * committed transaction contains "add to orphan" + * operation, we can completely invalidate the buffer + * now. We are rather through in that since the + * buffer may be still accessible when blocksize < + * pagesize and it is attached to the last partial + * page. + */ + jh->b_modified = 0; + if (!jh->b_next_transaction) { + clear_buffer_freed(bh); + clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh); + clear_buffer_mapped(bh); + clear_buffer_new(bh); + clear_buffer_req(bh); + bh->b_bdev = NULL; + } } if (buffer_jbddirty(bh)) { |