Merge tag 'v3.13-rc3' into drm-intel-next-queued

Linux 3.13-rc3

I need a backmerge for two reasons:
- For merging the ppgtt patches from Ben I need to pull in the bdw
  support.
- We now have duplicated calls to intel_uncore_forcewake_reset in the
  setup code to due 2 different patches merged into -next and 3.13.
  The conflict is silen so I need the merge to be able to apply
  Deepak's fixup patch.

Conflicts:
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c

Trivial conflict, it doesn't even show up in the merge diff.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 31e95acddb4..77c60e52939 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct memblock_type {
 };
 
 struct memblock {
+	bool bottom_up;  /* is bottom up direction? */
 	phys_addr_t current_limit;
 	struct memblock_type memory;
 	struct memblock_type reserved;
@@ -148,6 +149,29 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid)
 
 phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE
+/*
+ * Set the allocation direction to bottom-up or top-down.
+ */
+static inline void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable)
+{
+	memblock.bottom_up = enable;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check if the allocation direction is bottom-up or not.
+ * if this is true, that said, memblock will allocate memory
+ * in bottom-up direction.
+ */
+static inline bool memblock_bottom_up(void)
+{
+	return memblock.bottom_up;
+}
+#else
+static inline void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable) {}
+static inline bool memblock_bottom_up(void) { return false; }
+#endif
+
 /* Flags for memblock_alloc_base() amd __memblock_alloc_base() */
 #define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE	(~(phys_addr_t)0)
 #define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE	0