summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt44
-rw-r--r--drivers/md/dm-raid.c123
2 files changed, 140 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt b/Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt
index 56fb62b09fc..b428556197c 100644
--- a/Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt
+++ b/Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ The target is named "raid" and it accepts the following parameters:
raid10 Various RAID10 inspired algorithms chosen by additional params
- RAID10: Striped Mirrors (aka 'Striping on top of mirrors')
- RAID1E: Integrated Adjacent Stripe Mirroring
+ - RAID1E: Integrated Offset Stripe Mirroring
- and other similar RAID10 variants
Reference: Chapter 4 of
@@ -64,15 +65,15 @@ The target is named "raid" and it accepts the following parameters:
synchronisation state for each region.
[raid10_copies <# copies>]
- [raid10_format near]
+ [raid10_format <near|far|offset>]
These two options are used to alter the default layout of
a RAID10 configuration. The number of copies is can be
- specified, but the default is 2. There are other variations
- to how the copies are laid down - the default and only current
- option is "near". Near copies are what most people think of
- with respect to mirroring. If these options are left
- unspecified, or 'raid10_copies 2' and/or 'raid10_format near'
- are given, then the layouts for 2, 3 and 4 devices are:
+ specified, but the default is 2. There are also three
+ variations to how the copies are laid down - the default
+ is "near". Near copies are what most people think of with
+ respect to mirroring. If these options are left unspecified,
+ or 'raid10_copies 2' and/or 'raid10_format near' are given,
+ then the layouts for 2, 3 and 4 devices are:
2 drives 3 drives 4 drives
-------- ---------- --------------
A1 A1 A1 A1 A2 A1 A1 A2 A2
@@ -85,6 +86,33 @@ The target is named "raid" and it accepts the following parameters:
3-device layout is what might be called a 'RAID1E - Integrated
Adjacent Stripe Mirroring'.
+ If 'raid10_copies 2' and 'raid10_format far', then the layouts
+ for 2, 3 and 4 devices are:
+ 2 drives 3 drives 4 drives
+ -------- -------------- --------------------
+ A1 A2 A1 A2 A3 A1 A2 A3 A4
+ A3 A4 A4 A5 A6 A5 A6 A7 A8
+ A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A9 A10 A11 A12
+ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
+ A2 A1 A3 A1 A2 A2 A1 A4 A3
+ A4 A3 A6 A4 A5 A6 A5 A8 A7
+ A6 A5 A9 A7 A8 A10 A9 A12 A11
+ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
+
+ If 'raid10_copies 2' and 'raid10_format offset', then the
+ layouts for 2, 3 and 4 devices are:
+ 2 drives 3 drives 4 drives
+ -------- ------------ -----------------
+ A1 A2 A1 A2 A3 A1 A2 A3 A4
+ A2 A1 A3 A1 A2 A2 A1 A4 A3
+ A3 A4 A4 A5 A6 A5 A6 A7 A8
+ A4 A3 A6 A4 A5 A6 A5 A8 A7
+ A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A9 A10 A11 A12
+ A6 A5 A9 A7 A8 A10 A9 A12 A11
+ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
+ Here we see layouts closely akin to 'RAID1E - Integrated
+ Offset Stripe Mirroring'.
+
<#raid_devs>: The number of devices composing the array.
Each device consists of two entries. The first is the device
containing the metadata (if any); the second is the one containing the
@@ -142,3 +170,5 @@ Version History
1.3.0 Added support for RAID 10
1.3.1 Allow device replacement/rebuild for RAID 10
1.3.2 Fix/improve redundancy checking for RAID10
+1.4.0 Non-functional change. Removes arg from mapping function.
+1.4.1 Add RAID10 "far" and "offset" algorithm support.
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
index 9e58dbd8d8c..22fd5599372 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -91,15 +91,44 @@ static struct raid_type {
{"raid6_nc", "RAID6 (N continue)", 2, 4, 6, ALGORITHM_ROTATING_N_CONTINUE}
};
+static char *raid10_md_layout_to_format(int layout)
+{
+ /*
+ * Bit 16 and 17 stand for "offset" and "use_far_sets"
+ * Refer to MD's raid10.c for details
+ */
+ if ((layout & 0x10000) && (layout & 0x20000))
+ return "offset";
+
+ if ((layout & 0xFF) > 1)
+ return "near";
+
+ return "far";
+}
+
static unsigned raid10_md_layout_to_copies(int layout)
{
- return layout & 0xFF;
+ if ((layout & 0xFF) > 1)
+ return layout & 0xFF;
+ return (layout >> 8) & 0xFF;
}
static int raid10_format_to_md_layout(char *format, unsigned copies)
{
- /* 1 "far" copy, and 'copies' "near" copies */
- return (1 << 8) | (copies & 0xFF);
+ unsigned n = 1, f = 1;
+
+ if (!strcmp("near", format))
+ n = copies;
+ else
+ f = copies;
+
+ if (!strcmp("offset", format))
+ return 0x30000 | (f << 8) | n;
+
+ if (!strcmp("far", format))
+ return 0x20000 | (f << 8) | n;
+
+ return (f << 8) | n;
}
static struct raid_type *get_raid_type(char *name)
@@ -352,6 +381,7 @@ static int validate_raid_redundancy(struct raid_set *rs)
{
unsigned i, rebuild_cnt = 0;
unsigned rebuilds_per_group, copies, d;
+ unsigned group_size, last_group_start;
for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks; i++)
if (!test_bit(In_sync, &rs->dev[i].rdev.flags) ||
@@ -379,9 +409,6 @@ static int validate_raid_redundancy(struct raid_set *rs)
* as long as the failed devices occur in different mirror
* groups (i.e. different stripes).
*
- * Right now, we only allow for "near" copies. When other
- * formats are added, we will have to check those too.
- *
* When checking "near" format, make sure no adjacent devices
* have failed beyond what can be handled. In addition to the
* simple case where the number of devices is a multiple of the
@@ -391,14 +418,41 @@ static int validate_raid_redundancy(struct raid_set *rs)
* A A B B C
* C D D E E
*/
- for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks * copies; i++) {
- if (!(i % copies))
+ if (!strcmp("near", raid10_md_layout_to_format(rs->md.layout))) {
+ for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks * copies; i++) {
+ if (!(i % copies))
+ rebuilds_per_group = 0;
+ d = i % rs->md.raid_disks;
+ if ((!rs->dev[d].rdev.sb_page ||
+ !test_bit(In_sync, &rs->dev[d].rdev.flags)) &&
+ (++rebuilds_per_group >= copies))
+ goto too_many;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * When checking "far" and "offset" formats, we need to ensure
+ * that the device that holds its copy is not also dead or
+ * being rebuilt. (Note that "far" and "offset" formats only
+ * support two copies right now. These formats also only ever
+ * use the 'use_far_sets' variant.)
+ *
+ * This check is somewhat complicated by the need to account
+ * for arrays that are not a multiple of (far) copies. This
+ * results in the need to treat the last (potentially larger)
+ * set differently.
+ */
+ group_size = (rs->md.raid_disks / copies);
+ last_group_start = (rs->md.raid_disks / group_size) - 1;
+ last_group_start *= group_size;
+ for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks; i++) {
+ if (!(i % copies) && !(i > last_group_start))
rebuilds_per_group = 0;
- d = i % rs->md.raid_disks;
- if ((!rs->dev[d].rdev.sb_page ||
- !test_bit(In_sync, &rs->dev[d].rdev.flags)) &&
+ if ((!rs->dev[i].rdev.sb_page ||
+ !test_bit(In_sync, &rs->dev[i].rdev.flags)) &&
(++rebuilds_per_group >= copies))
- goto too_many;
+ goto too_many;
}
break;
default:
@@ -433,7 +487,7 @@ too_many:
*
* RAID10-only options:
* [raid10_copies <# copies>] Number of copies. (Default: 2)
- * [raid10_format <near>] Layout algorithm. (Default: near)
+ * [raid10_format <near|far|offset>] Layout algorithm. (Default: near)
*/
static int parse_raid_params(struct raid_set *rs, char **argv,
unsigned num_raid_params)
@@ -520,7 +574,9 @@ static int parse_raid_params(struct raid_set *rs, char **argv,
rs->ti->error = "'raid10_format' is an invalid parameter for this RAID type";
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (strcmp("near", argv[i])) {
+ if (strcmp("near", argv[i]) &&
+ strcmp("far", argv[i]) &&
+ strcmp("offset", argv[i])) {
rs->ti->error = "Invalid 'raid10_format' value given";
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -644,6 +700,15 @@ static int parse_raid_params(struct raid_set *rs, char **argv,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /*
+ * If the format is not "near", we only support
+ * two copies at the moment.
+ */
+ if (strcmp("near", raid10_format) && (raid10_copies > 2)) {
+ rs->ti->error = "Too many copies for given RAID10 format.";
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
/* (Len * #mirrors) / #devices */
sectors_per_dev = rs->ti->len * raid10_copies;
sector_div(sectors_per_dev, rs->md.raid_disks);
@@ -854,17 +919,30 @@ static int super_init_validation(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev)
/*
* Reshaping is not currently allowed
*/
- if ((le32_to_cpu(sb->level) != mddev->level) ||
- (le32_to_cpu(sb->layout) != mddev->layout) ||
- (le32_to_cpu(sb->stripe_sectors) != mddev->chunk_sectors)) {
- DMERR("Reshaping arrays not yet supported.");
+ if (le32_to_cpu(sb->level) != mddev->level) {
+ DMERR("Reshaping arrays not yet supported. (RAID level change)");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (le32_to_cpu(sb->layout) != mddev->layout) {
+ DMERR("Reshaping arrays not yet supported. (RAID layout change)");
+ DMERR(" 0x%X vs 0x%X", le32_to_cpu(sb->layout), mddev->layout);
+ DMERR(" Old layout: %s w/ %d copies",
+ raid10_md_layout_to_format(le32_to_cpu(sb->layout)),
+ raid10_md_layout_to_copies(le32_to_cpu(sb->layout)));
+ DMERR(" New layout: %s w/ %d copies",
+ raid10_md_layout_to_format(mddev->layout),
+ raid10_md_layout_to_copies(mddev->layout));
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (le32_to_cpu(sb->stripe_sectors) != mddev->chunk_sectors) {
+ DMERR("Reshaping arrays not yet supported. (stripe sectors change)");
return -EINVAL;
}
/* We can only change the number of devices in RAID1 right now */
if ((rs->raid_type->level != 1) &&
(le32_to_cpu(sb->num_devices) != mddev->raid_disks)) {
- DMERR("Reshaping arrays not yet supported.");
+ DMERR("Reshaping arrays not yet supported. (device count change)");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1329,7 +1407,8 @@ static int raid_status(struct dm_target *ti, status_type_t type,
raid10_md_layout_to_copies(rs->md.layout));
if (rs->print_flags & DMPF_RAID10_FORMAT)
- DMEMIT(" raid10_format near");
+ DMEMIT(" raid10_format %s",
+ raid10_md_layout_to_format(rs->md.layout));
DMEMIT(" %d", rs->md.raid_disks);
for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks; i++) {
@@ -1420,6 +1499,10 @@ static struct target_type raid_target = {
static int __init dm_raid_init(void)
{
+ DMINFO("Loading target version %u.%u.%u",
+ raid_target.version[0],
+ raid_target.version[1],
+ raid_target.version[2]);
return dm_register_target(&raid_target);
}